Friday, April 02, 2010

UFO/ET Political Tsunami

UFO/ET Political Tsunami on the Horizon
By Ed Komarek
Copy and Distribute Freely
My blog:

What Your Classified Briefer Does Not Want You to Know.

I think I can safely predict that as UFO/ET disclosure and integration into extraterrestrial reality moves forward, incumbent politicians of all stripes and persuasions will continue to find their political careers and even their lives on the line. Political challengers may soon be asking of incumbents, what did you know and when did you know it !

To make things even worse it appears that the super-secret Satellite Government may be becoming increasing hostile, increasing the climate of intimidation, fear and paranoia in Congress and other legislative bodies around the world as they are being briefed into UFO/ET realities. This would be a tactical effort to press for a conditional surrender rather than a unconditional one, in a battle the Satellite Government knows it is sure to eventually lose with legitimate constitutional authorities.

Politicians that have had classified briefings have become complicit in the UFO/ET cover-up unless they act right away to go public to protect themselves from the political aftermath of disclosure. Politicians should ask themselves are they being set up?

Classified UFO/ET briefings have put politicians around the world in a terrible catch 22 situation and they may not even realize it yet. Politicians are being presented with a choice to either go public now, to avoid complicity charges in spite of hostile political action and very real threats from the Satellite Government, or wait and allow angry political contenders in the the future without all this baggage try to remove them from office post-disclosure.

I think British Councilor Adrian Hicks is presenting a way out of this political catch 22 for political incumbents, and a way into office for future political challengers like himself in the spirit of Winston Churchill. As you can see from the above URL, Adrian says that the reason he ran for office was to help bring about disclosure.

Councilor Hicks, a official in elected public office, has taken the lead to boldly and courageously speak out in favor of rapid UFO/ET disclosure in an attempt to initiate an open public dialog among global policymakers. He presents global leaders with a public political platform that minimizes political damage and that I believe should be copied and emulated by members of Congress in the United States and by members of Parliaments around the world.

Councilor Hicks seems determined to do the right thing and aggressively take the American directed UFO/ET cover-up head on, even though his speech is conciliatory in relation to MJ 12 and the Americans. This is unlike Republican Senator John McCain and Representative Dennis Kucinich in the United states Congress who were forced to timidly and defensively confront the UFO/ET issue in their presidential campaigns in 2008. The reasons for such timidity and defensive posture would seem to be rooted in fear of UFOs being used as a political weapon against them, as well as continued hostility from the Satellite Government seeking to continue to control and modify the disclosure process to suit their own ends.

In my estimation this timid defensive approach is not good leadership and these and other members of Congress should understand that a good offense is the best defense against UFO/ET political and military attack while trying to bring this political taboo subject into open public political discussion. I think Councilor Adrian Hicks is providing true leadership and tactics to limit political damage from political adversaries in an often hostile mainstream press.

Winston Churchill in the early years was ridiculed and degraded for his early unpopular stand against fascism but when the crunch came he rose to be Prime Minister. I don't know if Councilor Hicks well enough to tell if he has the right stuff or not, but even if he does not, their will be politicians that follow who will. It's just a matter of time. ( The UFO/ET community is treacherous, let's hope Adrian uses good judgment and picks credible advisers like Colin Andrews ,Timothy Good , Richard Dolan Steve Bassett etc. to advise him.)

Key to Councilor Hicks bold political tactics is in addressing the issue directly in a well articulated manner forcing political opponents into a difficult position. Opponents have two choices to either promote his message by publicity attacking him, or hold back and allowing Mr. Hicks to get his message out to the global public in an undistorted fashion. Interestingly I seem to have evolved the the same tactic with my blog. Of course this tactic only works when the message is conveyed in an articulate, honest and truthful manner.

I have asked Councilor Hicks to provide some insight into his tactics so that policymakers around the world can benefit from his experience and bold decisive leadership with this UFO/ET issue. Here are Adrian's comments.

"Thank you for your reply. My tactics so far have been simple. The Judgment and Democracy speech was to give them (MJ 12 and Space Command) the opportunity to reply should they so wish. Indeed, for my part, I feel I put it on a plate for them. This has been a very steep learning curve for me. It has taken me awhile to get to the bottom of it all, but I think I have now."

"So tactically I have gone out of my way not to challenge those in charge of this. I wanted to give them an opportunity to reply. Yes, I have started a path, and I am in for the long haul. Please note, I am up for re-election next year, but there are many things I could and would do. I believe this should be done with their blessing at this time. We are in the most interesting time in history. Adrian"

Councilor Hicks message while bold in it's public presentation seems to be moving in the direction of advocating a political conciliatory position towards MJ 12 -NSA, or the PTB (Powers That Be), similar to that advocated by the Military UFO Working group and Source A in the United States. This would be the national reconciliation approach as implemented in South Africa to end Apartheid involving a conditional surrender and general amnesty of all groups involved in criminal and human rights violations.

This reconciliation approach would seem to be at odds with the unconditional surrender approach that advocates crushing MJ 12 - NSA and trying the leaders for war crimes and other human rights abuses. This approach would involve treating the super-secret Satellite UFO/ET Government as a terrorist organization to be targeted and destroyed. Such an approach would not go down well with the agencies involved and this brings up the issue of threats against those advocating UFO/ET disclosure. I would like to deal with the issue of threats in yet another article on specific issues related to integration into extraterrestrial reality.

I would expect many global politicians and military leaders to favor the reconciliation approach because they don't seem to have the courage to confront MJ - NSA or what it has evolved into head on. The untimely death of Congressman Schiff years ago and threats leveled against politicians to this day seems to have kept the politicians scattered like coveys of frightened quail harassed by a hawk.

I see a double standard where young solders are expected by politicians to put their lives on the line daily in the many wars around the globe against fascism and terrorism, but high level political and military leaders should not be expected to do the same in a case like this. No matter, at some point it will be the people who will decide which of these two approaches or something in between will be the course taken. It's easy to take the reconciliation approach when one has not been a victim of this 70 year old UFO/ET cover-up.